110
Hydrofoil ferry sets 160-nautical-mile record in longest sea voyage
(interestingengineering.com)
this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
110 points (96.6% liked)
Technology
80273 readers
3639 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Ok, let me explain what the evidence is:
Is it really that hard to get that?
I clicked on the post as I thought it's bullshit as I, who served in the navy for 15 years, did much more than 160Nmi without refueling many times. But apparently it's about a record for an electric boat, as clearly states in the original article's title. So the post's title changed the original title to clickbait.
But why is it triggering you so much that someone points that out? So much so you have to insult them as being childish? While at the same time behaving childish yourself. Are you just trolling for attention?
that is not how evidence works. articles on the web and their content are routinely updated after publication. it is far more logical than that someone took the headline and intentionally changed one word to piss you off, because... why tf would someone do that?
why is it triggering you so much when someone say "don't make stupid accusations without proof"?
Yet based on an assumption made by you. So your logic is flawed.
Who said it went like that? Someone just didn't copy-paste the title correctly, changing the essence of the message. Again you make poor assumptions, to prove your idea to be less idiotic. So to prove your poor assumption, you make the other option an even worse assumption. While failing to see something very simple: the fact the title is wrong.
It's triggering me someone is behaving like you did. Do you talk like that to people irl too? If so, it must suck getting punched in the face all the time, doesn't it?
The proof is right there but you fail to acknowledge it, as you find your own assumptions more likely. So you behave poorly and your logic is flawed. If you don't know what 'proof' and 'facts' are, you should open a thesaurus, work your way through it. So far you have shown the exactly same flawed reasoning of pseudoscientists and the attitude of a teenager on 4chan. I feel sorry for you.
I'm not going to continue a discussion with you. I just hope you will be able to treat others with a bit more respect in the future.
Have a nice fay
Thanks. I'm not write sure why this whole conversation is even happening...