this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
916 points (93.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

10712 readers
2073 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] papertowels@mander.xyz 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Elon musk popularized the electric car.

It had dumb handles that killed people. It lied about having self-driving capabilities. It had terrible manufacturing tolerances.

The "technically true" nature of it reads like propaganda against electric cars as a whole, does it not? I'd argue that applies here too.

[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Popularized" the electric car, maybe?

There were electric cars since there were cars

[–] papertowels@mander.xyz 5 points 2 days ago

Popularized it is. I was careful to not put invent, but morning brain not work good.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 days ago

Fair enough, I forgot that OP said "blockchain," instead of "bitcoin."

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Your example is not even close to technically true.

[–] papertowels@mander.xyz 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Sure. Sure. Insert your own example of applying the sins of a particular implementation of a technology to a hierarchical supergroup. That was an example I came up with in a few minutes on the shitter, not a deep philosophical argument.

_ is bad, because (specific implementation) has these flaws!

That's the issue being discussed here. It's misleading without precision.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)
  1. most electric cars are teslas so like a statistical analysis would be mostly correct.

2)propaganda against electric cars is generally just propaganda against cars in general, for example:

if full self driving becomes a thing you can expect traffic to become MUCH worse as like one minivan for a parent with 3 kids is replaced by four self driving cars that drive each kid around and one for the parent.

[–] papertowels@mander.xyz 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Doesn't have to be cars.

I'm just saying the original post is conflating criticisms against a particular implementation of blockchain with all blockchain.

"The wright brothers invented a useless machine they called the airplane. It only held one person and could fly for only a limited duration. It was also extremely dangerous."

That'd be a silly sentence, would it not?

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well that's very different than anything happening in the thread so yes its very silly.

The old newspapers are full of critiques of the ford model T and conflating them with all cars, most of those criticisms apply only to early cars. I think that's what you're getting at here.

But realistically in context the criticisms make sense. I would go as far as to say its more a problem that enthusiasts havent renamed bitcoin as a "cryptoasset" since its not useful as currency and apply "cryptocurrency" only to proof of stake designs.

Or as an analogy, it would be like calling a motorcycle a type of bicycle, which is more or less true, but its so goddamn different in use they had the sense to rename it so normal people would be able to tell them apart.

[–] papertowels@mander.xyz 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What are the differences that you see?

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think its mostly for most people "crypto" = "cryptocurrency" = "bitcoin" even though there's some categorical umbrellas there and I don't think there's a way to fix it without redefining cryptocurrency to only include currencies and specifically exclude bitcoin and similar coins. Blockchain has a similar problem because its used as a synonym for crypto.