this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2026
-1 points (42.9% liked)

AskHistorians

1240 readers
27 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Purely asking this for some fiction writing

Balkanised has become slang for "region formerly in a federation or union that has split into many small independent nations after the fall of said Union. Like happened in the Balkan region with the fall of USSR"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WHARRGARBL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

“…Like happened in the Balkan region with the fall of USSR.”

I’m unfamiliar with the history of Eastern Europe. Did the fall of the Soviet Union cause Yugoslavia to collapse into war?

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

The fall of the USSR was certainly a factor, but like most things the cause was multifaceted. Tito, the long term dictator of Yugoslavia died in 1980, and his replacements weren’t quite as skilled at stemming the rise of nationalist factions. On top of that, constitutional changes in the 70’s weakened federal power which fueled the growth of local nationalist factions. I’d say the final straw came from the man who came to power not long after Tito, Milošević. He was an ethnic Serb who moved to give Serbia more and more power in the nation over the other ethnic factions. This ultimately led to Slovenia and Croatia declaring independence and kicking off the conflict

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No, was more of a slow and gradual "we're leaving or else!" for member states in their case, except for a few which had a bit of a cold war, partially cause USSR had spread itself too thin and knew it couldn't hold them if a hot war broke out.