this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
206 points (98.6% liked)

Linux

11641 readers
492 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At this point, FHS feels more like a hindrance to me. Also, it was made in a time with very limited disk capacity and personal computers weren't much of a thing yet.

[–] khleedril@cyberplace.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

@MonkderVierte @Samueru_sama I don't think the standard (more like a guideline) is bad in itself: consistence of file-system use across applications is good for all our sanity. It is the assumption that all applications use it rigorously that is the problem. The word is SHOULD, not MUST.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

While i agree that a standard is useful, i think the FHS is out of date; it has lot's of fragmentation where it is not needed anymore, instead of keeping it simple. And also lots of reinterpretations, which makes it even more confusing. Which results in some people who learned FHS thing (but never why it happened) keeping slave-ish to it and doing nonsense in major distros. Which, again, results in small niche distro being forced to it too, because they lack the manpower to adapt the tooling.