this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
13 points (100.0% liked)

50501

2376 readers
1 users here now

50 States, 50 Protests, 1 Movement. https://fiftyfifty.one/ | #fiftyfiftyone
This is a backup community related to the 50501 movement. Find other communities at https://50501.chat/ and https://reddit.com/r/50501.

Rules

  1. NO VIOLENCE: This is a non-violent political movement! We do not tolerate violence or calls to violence; if that's what you are interested in, you're in the wrong place. Any comments or posts discussing firearms, weapons, violence, or any form of incitement will result in an immediate and nonnegotiable ban.
  2. RESPECT: Be respectful. Trolling, strawmanning, abuse, etc. will not be tolerated.
  3. INCLUSION: This movement is for everyone. Exclusionary language will not be tolerated.
  4. DOXXING/HARASSMENT: Doxxing or harassment will not be tolerated. Instant ban for violations of this rule.
  5. NO SELF-PROMOTION

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
BaldProphet@piefed.social
13
Effectiveness of organizing national slowdown vs 1 day strikes/economic blackouts (piefed.social)
submitted 2 days ago by gnuthing@piefed.social to c/50501@piefed.social
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I've been thinking about these 1 day strikes and no shopping days we've been having. The economic blackouts seem to not have much effect, I've seen it compared to a day of bad weather like we recently had with the snow and ice. Likewise, the 1 day strikes aren't achieving an actual loss of revenue that is enough to lead to change. Most Americans can't go on strike long-term as we live paycheck to paycheck, we don't have savings and we don't have mutual aid networks in place. Perhaps doing a nationwide slowdown would be more effective as we would actually be decreasing profits for the rich. It is something that could pick up steam instead of fizzle out. We can combine this with very clear demands instead of a general I don't like this admin vibe

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I'm not opposed to a slowdown, it's absolutely a useful tactic, and could be used by those not in a union, I agree.

But we really, really need at the very least all unionized workers to commit to a general strike. That would be a little under 10% of the population, and a significant amount of them are in critical industries that virtually the entire country and most corporations rely on (Shipping ports, trains, trucking, healthcare, etc). Even if just those committed to a general strike, we could win.

Everyone else could join a purchasing boycott combined with a slowdown during that same time, but a general strike is the action that will cause the most fear in the corporate elites.

The website you shared talks about earning trust in nonprofits for months to set up mutual aid networks

That's if you don't have any existing mutual aid networks (mostly rural areas). But for anyone who has existing mutual aid groups, or a local Food Not Bombs chapter, you can join those and begin making connections immediately.

Setting up a union also takes time.

I have been publicly spreading the message to join a union for years at this point, personally. And we do not know exactly when a larger general strike will occur, it may be many months before it does, and in which time everyone who can should be starting to process to unionize by contacting a union now.

[โ€“] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

.