this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
259 points (98.9% liked)

Fediverse

39600 readers
1488 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just thought I'd note this. Main beneficiary so far seems to be piefed.ca.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because it's a piefed feature set.

Based on rimus responses here and elsewhere they do not seem interested in feedback.

Even in their comment linking to a thread saying they welcome it, they were attacking someone providing it

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Where do you see that in the thread?

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Here = comm

And https://lemmy.world/comment/21861362 which leads to

https://piefed.social/comment/9670365

Where both calls anyone but them looking at the code amateurs and can't understand people wouldn't provide feedback if thought bad things in code were purposely done as so many projects will do that

There’s no need to listen to rumors and amateur speculation when we’re right here and happy to help. Come on in, the water’s fine!

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This comment was a month ago, and he was aware of people heavily slamming his project and showing no interest at all in actually sharing it to him.

He isn't specifically "calling out" anyone directly. All he says here is that the stuff people are complaining about here have been on piefed and not hidden since day zero.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Notice the quote from them specifically saying everyone but us are amateurs.

He isn't specifically "calling out" anyone directly. All he says here is that the stuff people are complaining about here have been on piefed and not hidden since day zero.

Again he's linking to the thread calling out others for looking at the code.

And again most are pointing out how terrible the code is and how odd it is for some of the features to exist.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Amateur speculation". I've directly replied to many people who have made false conclusions about parts of the code they looked at, mostly notably the claim that continues to persist that lemmy.ml is also defederated out of the box based on a complete misunderstanding of a specific code snippet.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Love that the respose ignores every point just deflects again to a completely different topic

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Saying some are doing amateur speculation is not the same thing as saying anyone who has issues are "amateurs".

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Except that is exactly how it reads.

ignore everyone else looking at the code because they're amateurs as we're the only professionals here

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's simply not how I read it at all. He's referring to people taking excerpts from the code and running away with long conclusions and motives based in some cases on presuppositions and assuming bad intent.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It reads as being upset anyone would dare read it. Especially with replying to the person pointing it out they wouldn't review anything they thought was intentional coded in a particular way.

Note this is completely separate from by stance after reading some of the code and stance of the level of it.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I simply do not share this interpretation of his comments at all.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know, but you also can't see anything but positives from anything they do

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And I can say the reverse to you. You interpret every decision made in the worst possible light.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Because I'm a cynical pet and keep seeing odd decisions made along with language that 80% of the time points to bad things.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Having actually interacted with rimu more than you, I think it's reasonable I simply dismiss your position here.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Which again doesn't change how others would perceive the language used.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Are you purely upset about the use of "amateur" here?

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

No it's their stance anyone reading the code has to talk with rimu or there's no way the person can understand it.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Its more one can ask and inquire here if they wish rather than snipe and spam it around the fediverse everywhere.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Again it's behave as I want and you have to talk to me or it's bad.

Am I talking to rimu now? Or just pr team?

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

"Behave as I want"? What? I think it's reasonable for a developer, any developer to not view those who, from their perspective, seek to denigrate their work, possibly in bad faith, across multiple sources.

You are talking to Skavau.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

So you do/can see the hostility from the language used. So piefed pr

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

No, I'm seeing hostility used from others across the wider fediverse. I don't think anything he said there was really specifically hostile at all in any thread. A complete reach.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Hostility by simply doing code reviews and questioning odd design choices?

Or hostility like the lemmy devs face constantly?

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Hostility by simply doing code reviews and questioning odd design choices?

By spamming it everywhere every chance they can in an effort to try and drive people from Piefed, by making no effort to inquire or outreach to anyone in a neutral way as to why the code is as they (think) it is.

But in comparison to the Lemmy admins. Sure. Do you think they take seriously, and view the opinions of those that are rude to them all across the fediverse?

Or hostility like the lemmy devs face constantly?

I mean he's been accused of running a CIA-style op (or compared to).

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Weird, I was told to only assume the positives in everything. Shouldn't they be happy to have people looking and spreading the code?

Now I see the issue its they didn't do it in pr or only ask in approved spaces (even though most are on instances rimu has blocked). How could they not want to be neutral after having it start with him completely against them.

I mean he's been accused of running a CIA-style op (or compared to).

I'm not sure what else they would expect when starting by explicitly banning leftists from the space they are currently in.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Now I see the issue its they didn’t do it in pr or only ask in approved spaces (even though most are on instances rimu has blocked). How could they not want to be neutral after having it start with him completely against them.

You think that Rimu would jump onto these instances that lets say are mutually ideological hostile and take notes and believe they're arguing in good faith?

I’m not sure what else they would expect when starting by explicitly banning leftists from the space they are currently in.

How has he done that outside of his control?

You think every single community that bans leftists (per your definition) is necessarily run or controlled by the CIA?

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You think that Rimu would jump onto these instances that lets say are mutually ideological hostile and take notes and believe they're arguing in good faith?

I'm saying they shouldn't be surprised when no one wants to discuss things with someone who specifically said they don't want anything to do with them. Which also goes back to the language rimu uses when questioned.

Again are you pr for piefed cause you are way to invested in defending it, doing best to distract from the actual points and issues brought up and seemly instantly responding.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 8 hours ago

I’m saying they shouldn’t be surprised when no one wants to discuss things with someone who specifically said they don’t want anything to do with them.

Right, and the feeling is mutual. I don't think it really matters how Piefed looked, or what it does - many of those users outright oppose any competing platform on the Fediverse because they believe you should help the Lemmy devs instead of making your own. So what's the end-game here?

Which also goes back to the language rimu uses when questioned.

He's clearly referring to the people who express what he views as bad faith commentary and attacks on his character from those instances and communities.

Again are you pr for piefed cause you are way to invested in defending it, doing best to distract from the actual points and issues brought up and seemly instantly responding.

You keep replying to me. I reply back. I pretty much reply to everyone if I have something else to say so long as you keep replying to me.