this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
354 points (99.4% liked)

World News

52790 readers
1999 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

France is to enshrine in law the end of so-called "conjugal rights" – the notion that marriage means a duty to have sex.

A bill approved on Wednesday in the National Assembly adds a clause to the country's civil code to make clear that "community of living" does not create an "obligation for sexual relations".

The proposed law also makes it impossible to use lack of sexual relations as an argument in fault-based divorce.

Though unlikely to have a major impact in the courts, supporters hope the law will help deter marital rape.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

It’s not just a tradition it’s a tradition that actively creates and informs legal rules anchored to that tradition

Your analogy between the enduring institution of marriage with Christmas lights is simply false

https://www.logical-fallacy.com/articles/false-analogy/

[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Your argument seems more against religion (and inferrably monogamy) than it does marriage itself. Especially if "civil union" is your alternative.

I don't see what the benefit would be to just go through the family law and replace the term "marriage" with "civil union".

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 16 hours ago

Health Insurance is a big one.

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Civil unions can be a mere superficial replacement of the name but it can also be a creative and new way to create legal relationships

Civil unions being basically just marriages is lazy and people should just enter into legal relationships with one another for various reasons (child custody, medical determinations, property distribution etc)

There are tax and government benefit reasons to get married it’s an artificially maintained institution to perpetuate notions of the family and continued existence of a people

It needs to be abolished and society needs to respect different and specific legal arrangements that people make instead

[–] JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Okay, you right, I wrong, Merry Christmas.