World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
Unfortunately for you, two groups of people having knowledge about the same thing does not mean that they use the same words to refer to that knowledge (see "aluminum" vs. "aluminium", or maybe more appropriately, "soccer" vs. "football"). Americans and Canadians both knowing about ice hockey does not mean that they use the same words to refer to the sport, and to assume otherwise is uninformed and wrong. Like, this is Ling 101 levels of basic.
Ah the hubris that comes with unquestioned assumptions based on your own dialect.
My wife cracked up the first time I asked her if she wanted me to "carry her to the store" (meaning "drive her"), which genuinely shocked me, because I had had zero reason up until that moment to think that idiom was unique to my own dialect area, especially when we're from roughly the same region.
The point is, you're very clearly, demonstrably wrong about this. Based on a poll of just the four people in my household, three of them would say "ice hockey" while the other says that they would probably just say "hockey".
One can also realize that not everyone speaks like people paid to have a career in a specific sport. Maybe asking people with literally the most possible bias for one over the other isn't the best way to go about capturing linguistic diversity.
Based on what? Your ass? Because New Yorkers famously sound just like Canadians and don't at all have a very famous, particular way of talking...
We already have an excellent data point that this may not in fact be true. That data point? The fact that Trump, who is a New Yorker, educated in New York, as you pointed out, said "ice hockey" in fluent speech instead of saying "hockey".
Demonstrating that there clearly exist Americans who say "ice hockey" instead of "hockey" is an excellent data point when discussing whether this is a dialect difference between some American and Canadian speakers.
All of your assertions come, like I said, straight from your ass, and are therefore much less relevant to the discussion.
And, of course, the main point, once again, because I think it's important:
WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU CRITICIZING TRUMP FOR SAYING "ICE HOCKEY" INSTEAD OF, Y'KNOW, CRITICIZING HIM FOR THE HORRIBLE SHIT HE'S DOING TO CANADA??
First, when you use someone who obviously has dementia as your reference point for what a group of people do, you are probably wrong unless the groups you're referring to is people with dementia.
Second, promoters use the terms people are most likely to associate with the products they're promoting, not what it is or think it should be called. That's why you'll hear diamond advertisements use the word diamond and not carbon allotrope, because one of them has no relevance to their customers.
Third, I'm not here to talk about Trump. Ive been saying shitty things about him since before Lemmy existed, and this tidbit is almost completely irrelevant to the issues Canada has with respect to Trump. I'm here to talk about your hot take that is probably relevant to the 2% of Americans (that number is for color and is neither an opinion nor an assertion, and if it is a fact, that is purely coincidental) who naturally assume hockey refers to field hockey or who have declined sufficiently due to dementia that they have difficulty with context when speaking.
Ok, you've made it completely clear by this point that you know practically nothing about dialectology and refuse to be educated (much less respond to the points I made in my comment), so I think I'm gonna just leave the conversation here.
Says the guy who said they asked 3 people from a closely associated subgroup about their preferred term, they all agreed with my stance, and so I applied it to the general population, specifically an individual who isn't also a part of that subgroup. At least, I sincerely hope you aren't a close relative of Trump.