this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2026
409 points (99.3% liked)
news
458 readers
964 users here now
A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.
Rules:
- Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
- Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
- Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
- Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
- No link shorteners
- No entire article in the post body
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is how journalism should be. If we had more of this the past decade or so in the mainstream media, we might not be where we are now. But at least the other journalists protected their jobs and ability to continue to show what the politicians wanted you to see.
I think that blurring the line between journalist and protestor is dangerous, and in any event you can't break the law just because you are a journalist.
I didn't think she was ever inside after being asked to leave was she? If not then what law exactly do you believe was broken?
Well if she didn't do anything illegal then she should be released after being interviewed about the criminal activity that did happen.
What criminal activity! You don't raid a house to interview a witness dipshit. For a person named Occam's razor you really don't seem to understand the principal or basic logic for that matter.
She was arrested under allegations of criminal activity. Im not here to explain the laws or act like I have enough knowledge about the situation to say if she actually did anything illegal or not.
That's quite literally what you're doing.
All I know is what is read from official channels and from what some random person on the internet is telling what actually happened and how i should interpret it instead.
No one has told you what happened.
What are you talking about? There are a bunch of news articles about it. Now we just wait and see if the allegations stick or if it was trumped up in the first place. I don't even know what you are going on about.
None of the articles I've seen accuse them of a crime nor provide any proof.
Which one exactly and keep in mind two federal judges said there wasn't enough to charge.
The articles with an ounce of journalistic integrity, of which there are many, state what she was accused of, the circumstances under which she was detained. They do not state whether she is guilty or not because they don't know and because you don't know either. Everything else is speculation. Either the police will drop the charges or the courts will be determine. Actually not sure why I'm wasting time explaining things to someone who has no desire whatsoever to have a good faith discussion.
The only thing they've been accused of are charges about judge already threw out, they just went a different route to recharge the same charges with less ability for a judge to toss them out.
I guess this conversation has dragged on long enough that it looks like we have our answers. Enjoy this last opportunity to down vote me!
I'd rather not need to but you do you boo boo, I'm sure minimizing fascism is a proper blast when you don't get pushback.