this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
5 points (100.0% liked)

Strategy Games

1086 readers
1 users here now

Computer games with a strategic component; construction, expansion, armies, economic development. Discussion on all sub-genres (RTS, Grand Strategy, Economic Strategy) is welcome, but the focus is on generic strategy games and hybrid games that don't fit into the following communities:


Some other gaming communities across the Threadiverse:


Game specific communities across the Threadiverse:


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Piefed.world Rules - https://legal.piefed.world/tos

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No spam, illegal content, or games with excessive, non-artistic NSFW content (e.g. hentai or porn games).

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent genres (e.g. RTS, TBS) are of course fine.


founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Imagine playing modern paradox games

[–] Agent_Karyo@piefed.world 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I used to be a big fan, not so much for their Grand Strategy games (I've played CK2, Victoria for about ~15 hours each and it didn't click), but because they worked with Colossal Order , the creators of Cities in Motion (upon which Cities: Skylines is based).

They really have become a European EA.

[–] NutinButNet@hilariouschaos.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s ironic considering they were there to replace EA for the city building SimCity series with Cities: Skylines when SimCity 2013 utterly shit the bed.

[–] Agent_Karyo@piefed.world 1 points 1 week ago

I believe SimCity 2013 was the last EA game I played. I even pre-ordered two copies (one for myself and one for my brother).

They basically committed fraud by knowingly misrepresenting the nature of their product. The early promo videos pitched a complex non-statistical, agent-based simulation. That was of course de facto discarded and the whole game was a dysfunctional attempt at making a "live service" style multiplayer game in genre that's in many way fundamentally a single player experience.

Paradox feels marginally better than EA these days.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)