this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
71 points (94.9% liked)
Slop.
775 readers
541 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Studies on the psychologies of reactionaries and right-wingers disproves this assertion, the traits of the average fascist are one-to-one compared to the symptoms of neurotoxin poisoning like lead
You don't know what you're talking about, right-wingers are over-represented among the sufferers of brain related comorbidities, if an already right-wing society suffers an historical period of mass poisoning that causes brain damage leading to those people developing sociopathic and anti-social behaviors, than yes, the vast majority of those people will became right-wing with lead becoming the main driver in their identity formation, not because lead has magic powers, but because it destroyed their brains
We know the effects lead has on the brain, we know the majority of boomers and GenX were lead poisoned during childhood (the worst possible stage to suffer neurotoxin poisoning), we know right-wingers are over-represented in terms of brain injuries
If you can't connect the dots then it's because you don't want to, it's utterly bizarre not to recognize an important environmental multiplier in right-wing societal formation
Your argument as it stands is picking out correlations, assuming a causal direction without demonstrating it by anything but a hypothetical just-so account, and ignoring all other variables (e.g. subsequent economic decline and the resultant wealth stratification with low social mobility causing an exaggerated stratification in political ideology). We have already long-acknowledged several of these correlations, but that in itself is not adequate for a causal account. Also,
Do you not see how this was already my basic claim, that every level of society is built to guide people toward reaction and that's the real core of the issue? Of course, I think your phrasing still understates it a little, because (not that I think you'd actually defend this claim) it's as though society is merely sitting with this orientation rather than a machine actively working to turn as rightward as it can sustain, which I think you'd agree is the reality.
The demonstration is the vast body of evidence of severe brain damage among countless millions of people
Again, you can assert that entire populations suffering from compromised brain development has no MAJOR causal links or effects on the course of society (despite the fact the symptoms manifest as anti-social behavior) be my guest, believe in idealism
And do you not understand that claim is completely dwarfed, subsumed, made subordinate to the reality that brain damage across entire populations has far more valence, for the simple fact that thing between our ears is little more important than ideological conditioning
Certain ideologies do not stick to people who have brains geared towards empathy, so what do you think happens to a society where millions of people thru childhood poisoning literally lose the ability to empathize? Yes, then certain ideologies become more popular than they were ever meant to be, that's my point