this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
-14 points (20.8% liked)

Showerthoughts

39630 readers
1253 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Are we talking to them for entertainment or information? Because it might be more fun to hear a flat earther try to explain their beliefs, but you probably wouldn't want to adopt those beliefs.

[–] presoak@lazysoci.al -4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (3 children)

A flat earther who did the math. Set up the experiment and measured the tangential angles of light rays or whatever. Worries about the hundred ways he may have fucked up his calculations.

A round earther who googled it. Knows with certainty. Knows what all smart people know to be obviously true.

Well you see my point.

Also, focus is a powerful and funny thing. You could hide an elephant in the room if you are focused on the tv. It's a kind of useful insanity

[–] Bongles@lemmy.zip 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You've changed the comparison from your post. A round earther who googled it, is not a focused and passionate expert. They googled why the Earth is round and accepted it. A focused and passionate expert by nature of being an expert can do all the calculations that actually work and prove the Earth is round (nevermind the fact we've seen it from space at this point). Those focused and passionate experts are exactly the interesting people you want to talk to, because they intimately understand what they're experts on and can go on and on about it in detail.

[–] presoak@lazysoci.al 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I was offering a completely different point.

[–] Bongles@lemmy.zip 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Then consider what I said in regards to your original post, is it not true?

[–] presoak@lazysoci.al 1 points 14 hours ago

Well I stated that I think the opposite clearly enough.

I appreciate the depth but ya. Wideness

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

worries about the hundred ways he may have fucked up

lol. check out Beyond the Curve.

[–] presoak@lazysoci.al -3 points 21 hours ago

Lol? Seeiously?

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Well you see my point.

I really don't.

[–] presoak@lazysoci.al -4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

If you have a point, make it.

If being snarky and defensive is your only reaction when someone questions your statement, then you probably didn't have a point to make.

[–] presoak@lazysoci.al -2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Ok fine.

The first guy is smart. The second guy is dumb.

Your non-understanding is either intentional or unintentional. Both look like a miserable slog to me.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

See? That's why I asked.

You described someone who was trying really hard to do everything wrong, and refused to believe it when he confirmed he was wrong. That guy is much more stupid than someone who easily finds answers that have been calculated centuries ago.

[–] Griffus@lemmy.zip 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

So are you saying that someone who knew what they where doing 5k years ago and almost perfectly calculated the circumference of the earth knows more about the shape of the earth than what I see on the horizon and all of my scientifically illiterate calculations??? Seems improbable.

[–] presoak@lazysoci.al -1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

One is the product of firsthand observation and careful reasoning, the other is a story told by authority.

Surely you appreciate the difference.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, one is completely wrong and arrogant.

[–] presoak@lazysoci.al 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

You argue like a medieval religious zealot. And that seems to be completely normal.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

But I haven't chained you up or tortured you once!

[–] presoak@lazysoci.al 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

A medieval religious zealot's style of argumentation is characterized by his appeal to dogma.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

That's a fun fact, I'll have to remember that, but to be clear, I'm not saying nobody should question authority, by all means, question away, do some research, find out why the established truths are established truths.

But, I don't understand why we should give any respect to someone who wastes time unsuccessfully trying to deny reality.

If someone went into space and sent back a photo of a flat earth, I might start asking questions myself, but so far, despite numerous attempts, there is absolutely no evidence of that, so I think anyone wasting their time on that endeavor is on the same level as someone trying to flap their arms until they fly away.

[–] presoak@lazysoci.al 0 points 17 hours ago
[–] presoak@lazysoci.al -1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Thus we enter the miserable slog. No thanks.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

I'm starting to understand why you appreciate ignorance over knowledge.

[–] presoak@lazysoci.al -1 points 21 hours ago

Wow good point.