this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
71 points (94.9% liked)

Slop.

774 readers
570 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BeanisBrain@hexbear.net 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I wonder why [...] socialist thought experienced a revival among the generations born after lead exposure was curtailed?

Deteriorating material conditions for the lower classes?

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's the response to a stressor that's important, not merely the existence of the main stressor, and this generation's response to deteriorating material conditions is far different to the response the boomers gave to the recessions and shocks of the 70s

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You are tacitly assuming that those are equivalent and they plainly aren't.

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 1 points 4 days ago

We are literally in the middle of a stagflationary bubble, so yes they are equivalent enough to make comparisons

As this point you're just being contrarian