this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
174 points (99.4% liked)

Privacy

45730 readers
424 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://discuss.online/post/34598392

FBI Director Kash Patel said Monday that he had opened an investigation into the Signal group text chats that Minnesota residents are using to share information about federal immigration agents’ movements, launching a new front in the Trump administration’s conflict there with potential free speech implications.

Patel said in an interview with conservative podcaster Benny Johnson that he wanted to know whether any Minnesota residents had put federal agents “in harm’s way” with activities such as sharing agents’ license plate numbers and locations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tilgare@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (10 children)

At this point, I don't even know why Signal shouldn't be used here. But I'm so sick of the stream of good apps that enshitify and get replaced by apps that also enshitify. I assume something like that has happened here. Is nobody left on this fucking planet that will stand up for the things they believe in?

[–] artyom@piefed.social -1 points 1 week ago (9 children)

don't even know why Signal shouldn't be used here

Because Signal does not support anonymity. If someone joins the group using their real name, they've just doxxed themselves and painted targets on their backs.

[–] Tilgare@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (8 children)

But doesn't Signal support disappearing messages? And end to end encryption? Meaning they'd need a recipient's phone in order to see them at all. Although, now that I'm thinking it through in this context of a big group chat full of people you don't/barely know, I can see the higher risk profile. So it's bad in this circumstance, assuming messages are persistent.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 8 points 1 week ago

Disappearing messages are a client side convention, they are not part of the protocol, they cannot be enforced. There are signal clients that never expire messages, screen capture, archive, etc

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)