this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
571 points (98.0% liked)
People Twitter
9024 readers
1706 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The second one. The boat is meant to represent a dragon, just without the appendages, and the second one is where its back legs would be. Could also have a pair for up front, I suppose.
That begs the question if pants are a "back legs only, not front legs", or "legs only, not arms".
Taking it to the extreme, would pants for a centipede look more like a tube with "sleeves" all along it or just like a tiny pair of normal (to us) pants?
This was under the assumption that it's a 4 legged dragon. If the theoretical front appendages are arms, no pants up front. Although thinking about it again, with no junk to protect, front pants are kinda useless, so maybe don't bother with them at all.
I'd say for any animal with multiple legs that are very close together, no pants at all would be best. At that point they'd be more of a hindrance than a help!