this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
412 points (100.0% liked)

politics

27968 readers
2396 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Widely circulated video of Pretti’s killing by federal agents undercut earlier assertions of him being a gunman

White House officials sought to rapidly distance Donald Trump and top officials from their initial portrayals of the man fatally shot by federal officials in Minnesota as a gunman, as they faced a deepening backlash after video footage was widely seen to undercut their assertions.

The move came as Trump advisers appeared to realize that the caustic portrayals of the man, Alex Pretti, who was reportedly licensed to carry a gun, had turned the killing into an even larger political liability for the president.

Over the weekend, senior administration officials including Stephen Miller, the deputy chief of staff, called the victim “a domestic terrorist who tried to assassinate law enforcement”, while Kristi Noem, the homeland security secretary, accused him of perpetrating “the definition of domestic terrorism”.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

This administration is like Game of Thrones with the cast of Veep.

If these evil idiots had half a brain, they wouldn’t have immediately bum rushed the press and social media with half baked lies. They could’ve taken a beat to fully bake their lies.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They do not think they have to try, their guys usually pretend to agree with them. They never bother with plausibility now.

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's the eternal problem with echo chambers. Everything's smooth and good until you step outside it and someone laughs at you and points out the giant booger on your face that no sycophant could possibly have brought to your attention.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

Epstein also met with Israeli intelligence regularly, he took private jet flights with the intelligence boss to Israel and back. Also prime ministers and other officials. It hasn't been much of a secret for a while. Yet everyone ignored us telling people about it until the right wing fringe picked up on it, grateful they did don't get me wrong we need the help. Carlsen and a MTG and Owens (I don't even know who that one is,) have all been pumping that fact.

Also Carlsen and Owens are I think on another one I believe, that Israel, or their factions in the US, were behind the Kirk killing. The official story is impossible, that rifle would've made a dramatically different hamburger themed wound at that range. Other problems. Why lie? Turns out the Israeli faction was on him to appoint a couple of their guys to the board, and wanted him to follow their vision, which is what they are doing now, hitler youth, policing schools, k12 and university, compiling information on students and teachers, etc. Kirk had his own vision, rejected theirs.

Anyway the Epstein one is pretty overwhelming evidence. If you are interested in the kirk one, check youtube videos of dudes firing that 30 ought 6 at different objects at that distance, to get a feel for how insulting to our intelligence the official story is. The rifle takes down bear, elk, moose. Exit wound would be fist sized, not the least in the soft neck. So whomever did it has the authorities covering for them.