this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2026
317 points (97.9% liked)

Videos

17394 readers
802 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only (aside from meta posts flagged with [META])
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed
  9. AI generated content must be tagged with "[AI] …" ^Discussion^

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They stole the ideas we stole!

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No one stole anything. Chinese battery tech is a decade ahead of anyone.

[–] lemonSqueezy@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

But it's true. The standard Chinese model is to steal all IP, from all tech that they do not yet control. They use cheap labor to import all manufacturing from developed countries. Then, they steal the IP and turn around and make it theirs. That's how they've caught up so fast from a closed out isolated farming hermit for decades, into a modern powerhouse that wants to take over the world.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 hours ago

IP is a bullshit concept that slows down the progress of humanity. They take what is learned and improve on it then sell that because why the fuck wouldn’t you. The only people who have a problem with this are moronic capitalists that say “grrr how dare you improve my technology before I earn my money from it! It’s my idea! I own it forever”.

There is maybe some debate about a small reasonable period to allow someone to recoup r&d costs. On the other hand we can look to an example like during Covid: American pharma companies were not sharing research about mRNA vaccines with each other or the world in the hopes of being “the first” and the financial gains that would come with this. Accelerating this process through collaborative effort would’ve literally saved tens of thousands of lives. This was often defended by Americans who are so indoctrinated they couldn’t possibly conceptualize a world without this approach. “Of course Pfizer needs the IP? How else will they make their money??”

We excuse it because most of the time it doesn’t really matter. A slightly better phone or laptop or whatever is not a huge deal. But then you see things like the Covid example and start to wonder: if that broke down and everything was basically “open source” how much further along would we be?

[–] lemonSqueezy@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The american companies are ok with it because of capitalism. The executive team gets a generous salary, bonus. Or they believe that they are ok with giving away decades worth of engineering research and development for cheap labor, and that at the arms race American engineering will always be one step ahead, so they will never lose market share.

[–] lemonSqueezy@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

They reaffirmed Musk that he's the King, but in the long game, they already have the Queen.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

I was joking, but yes China has perfected and created even better technologies.