this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2026
79 points (98.8% liked)

Slop.

819 readers
453 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 47 points 1 month ago (3 children)

This is especially weird because no one denies the famine or says the victims were all kulaks (and I think kulaks who died were often outright killed rather than starving), the famine is recognized as being a tragedy that caused great suffering among the peasantry. Like, the number gets exaggerated (and even what they give in the OOP is probably an exaggeration) but even if a tenth of that number died, that's still a massive tragedy and not at all a desirable outcome in the eyes of the so-called "tankies."

It's one of the most irritating things about liberals that they literally just don't understand socialists' assertions to the point that you need to question if they've ever even been directly exposed to one such person explaining their positions.

[–] anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's the whole point of straw men, they're really easy to beat up and they can't fight back. It's doubtful any of these assholes have ever met or interacted with a "tankie".

[–] MaoTheLawn@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago

A tankie? Oh you mean like that Ro Kahnna guy?

[–] Self_Sealing_Stem_Bolt@hexbear.net 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They dont care about the dead either btw, they never mention any of the other countries effected by the famine, which were worse, its always Ukraine. Its always and only ukraine. (The answer is nazis)

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I think Ukraine might have actually been hit the hardest if we're dividing it by nations, but you're right certainly that the narrative falls apart when you consider that Russia itself was quite effected, and the part of Ukraine that was effected was mainly eastern Ukraine, which even then was much more Russian than the west. The idea of it being a genocide by Russians against Ukrainians is just complete garbage and the answer is indeed Nazis doing "accusation in a mirror".

[–] Self_Sealing_Stem_Bolt@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I thought Kazakhstan got it worse but it doesnt really matter, its all about the narrative for these people.

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I could be wrong, there's a cottage industry of pumping the numbers for Ukraine specifically, so my view is probably distorted. Kazakhstan was minimally hit comparably hard, so your original point remains regardless, as you say.

[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If I remember correctly, Ukraine lost more in real numbers, but Kazakhstan lost more in proportion to their population size. I don't remember the percentages.

[–] RondoRevolution@hexbear.net 14 points 1 month ago

Yeah, they need to straw man otherwise they would have to concede that we are right. At this point it's easy to spot who is talking out of ignorance and who is talking out of malice to further their political beliefs.