this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2026
488 points (98.8% liked)

politics

27335 readers
2501 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In a Truth Social post on Thursday, Trump announced that he was revising a lawsuit against The New York Times to include the organization’s polling research, which currently shows him tanking on everything from the economy and immigration to his handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7101334@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

We’re already there. That’s how this happened.

The nation started with only white, land-owning men being able to vote (land which they stole from indigenous people using genocidal violence). Now it's mostly only wealthy, land-owning, disproportionately-white men and women influencing the direction of the nation (at least "through the proper channels").

I think you might have a mythologized vision of America based on the Civil Rights era. That was the exception, not the rule.

Until that point, DNC is by far the lesser of two evils

Once you reach the point where you're guilty of genocide, I don't think you're allowed to play "lesser" evil anymore. Even if you "only" genocide 400,000 people and 'the other guy' genocides 800,000 people, you're both just irredeemably evil.

We need grassroots that can organize and reform

Again, we already had that with Bernie Sanders and the DNC rigged it. "Grassroots reform" in the capacity you're talking about is a democratic function. You cannot play democracy with a fundamentally un-democratic institution.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The nation started with only white, land-owning men being able to vote (land which they stole from indigenous people using genocidal violence). Now it’s mostly only wealthy, land-owning, disproportionately-white men and women influencing the direction of the nation (at least “through the proper channels”).

fair

I think you might have a mythologized vision of America based on the Civil Rights era. That was the exception, not the rule.

I disagree, but it's not worth pursuing, also fine.

Once you reach the point where you’re guilty of genocide, I don’t think you’re allowed to play “lesser” evil anymore. Even if you “only” genocide 400,000 people and ‘the other guy’ genocides 800,000 people, you’re both just irredeemably evil.

So the answer is moonshot for independent, which will fail and keep RNC in office. That's your plan? Let's just genocide the non whites here?

Again, we already had that with Bernie Sanders and the DNC rigged it. “Grassroots reform” in the capacity you’re talking about is a democratic function. You cannot play democracy with a fundamentally un-democratic institution.

Kind of tiresome to keep covering the same ground, Bernie wasn't fucking grass roots. You're not going to encact change by chaning out the head. You need to start at the bottom, push congress, then roll over the SCOTUS. You're not going to move shit by putting in an ineffective president over a butthurt congress.

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I don't have a plan for salvaging America because I do not believe it's salvageable. I already said that earlier in this discussion. I've spent days and days and days thinking about it, and that's the conclusion I've arrived at. This political discussion we're having here isn't me suggesting how to save the nation; I just refuse to sign my name on endorsing a genocidaire to command the world's largest military. I'm under no illusion that that will stop the genocide, it'll just alleviate my own complicity to the extent possible while still living within America. (As well as being sure to avoid buying any Israeli goods, supporting BDS boycotts, etc.) I believe any person of conscience should also refuse to be complicit in such a manner.

My activism is not aimed at saving America, it's aimed at helping innocent people survive what I view as its inevitable collapse with as little suffering as possible. Building community and food sovereignty. It's nothing glorious but it's more glorious than starving.