this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2026
111 points (98.3% liked)

Canada

10933 readers
912 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It was a moment of global clarity. Prime Minister Mark Carney’s speech to the world’s political and economic elite gathered in Davos this week described global realities, past and present, with a candour and nuance rarely heard from a serving politician.

The message was twofold.

First, Carney made clear that the world has changed, and the old comfortable ways of global politics are not coming back. Those who wait for sanity to return are waiting in vain. We are in a world increasingly shaped by the threat and the use of hard power. All states must accept that reality.

Despite this, Carney’s second and more hopeful message was that while the globally powerful may act unilaterally, others — notably “middle powers” like Canada — are not helpless.

By finding ways to co-operate on areas of shared interest, states like Canada can pool their limited resources to build what amounts to a flexible network of co-operative ties. Taken together they can provide an alternative to simply rolling over and taking whatever great powers like the United States dole out.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FreeBooteR69@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I feel this is a pivotal moment in history. If we can somehow avoid an American invasion, we can help build a more just and equitable world, one that can stand in front of giants and say, nuh uh with a waggy finger!

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The key part comes from what Carney said about living in the lie: we can't just give lip service to those principles, like we did before.

I honestly have no idea what that would look like. Should we have put boots on the ground in Ukraine? What about the CCP's oppression of Uyghurs? Okay, now climate change?

Maybe the answer is that we be less principled, but honest about where we're willing to act.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Maybe the answer is that we be less principled, but honest about where we're willing to act.

This. He said that in unambiguous terms that being able to act on principle is a right won on the back of having eliminated your vulnerability to coercion.

That means a country that wants to act in principled manner must be able to produce what it needs to survive and defend itself. Otherwise demanding country X do Y when you depend on X for your survival is just propaganda theatre produced for whoever it placates. We're very far from that, so we're likely dropping the theatre.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In theory we have a principled stance on Ukraine, Gaza, Afghanistan, and whatever is going down in Myanmar. We don't depend on those countries, but I would be very surprised if we change our verbiage or actions toward those countries.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

I think it's gonna be case by case basis depending on the expected blowback.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Given that Carney will allow corporations to rule Canada with an iron fist it will only be a different kind of tyranny. Between a rock and a hard place and all that.

God. I hate living in this timeline.

[–] FreeBooteR69@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I think we aren't as powerless as you think and that we have both done something that seems small but is a step in the direction of freedom from those corporations. We have joined a platform not owned by them. We have freedom to choose and make our thoughts heard still. So elbows up into the jaw of cynicism.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca 1 points 15 hours ago

I donated to Avi Lewis for NDP. I voted NDP before and going forward they are the only ones getting my vote.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

but is a step in the direction of freedom from those corporations.

The Liberal party introduced Bill C-15 which literally allows any corporation to be exempted from any law.

https://lemmy.ca/post/59019030

They know who they want to rule us.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

90%+ of every policy in every country in the world is written at the request of corporations.

[–] grey_maniac@lemmy.ca 1 points 17 hours ago

Usually guided by McKinsey, Bain, or BCG.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Us here, yes. That said parent's talking about what Carney might do to achieve the vision of regaining sovereignty and that's one likely future given similar historical conditions. If that's where it goes, we'd have to do a lot more to resist getting crushed by the corporate machine than we're doing today. There's historical templates for that too so there's reason for optimism. E.g. radical unionism.

I share your optimism though. I also think that barring invasion, we'll be alright and possibly have decent future. At least until climate change destabilizes the world. :D