this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2026
53 points (98.2% liked)

Games

21204 readers
181 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

No it's not, the community is just paying for it collectively! The players deserve a game that's better because they're still paying for it as a group instead of as individuals! Stop individualising yourselves so much that you can't even critique a product anymore!

screm-a

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I don't even really care if it's whales or not in a lot of cases. I actually think the inherent anti-whale thing is driving individualism and causing players to fight among themselves. If they united with the whales they'd have a stronger voice as one community.

A lot of these people drawing the distinction between the whales and themselves are paying players anyway. It's a tool of division. Splitting the playerbase into fighting among themselves instead of directing their criticisms and desires in a united way towards the developers. A lot of it reminds me of the identity-based infighting in the working class and how it divides them up into bickering among themselves instead of directing their, ahem... criticisms... at the bourgeoisie. It's not 1:1 but many of the behaviours are similar just in a consumerist space.

[–] Horse@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 2 days ago

plus a lot of so-called "whales" are just people with average or below average incomes who are vulnerable to the predatory practices these free-to-play game companies spend immense time and resources to develop
the idea that they are all rich people is largely a myth

[–] save_vs_death@hexbear.net 2 points 2 days ago

i'm not talking about whales as a player, i'm talking about whales from the perspective of the company making it free to play, i think f2p is inherently predatory so i don't play them