this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2026
176 points (99.4% liked)

news

411 readers
530 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was so busy laughing I forgot to be angry, sorry jewelery comapnies

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They have insurance for this. They'll be fine.

[–] KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's the even bestest part. The jewelery companies intentionally undervalued the pieces in order to lower the cost of insuring it all. The jewelers are now suing Brinks because their insurance will only pay out the insured amount, which was about $10m. Brinks is countersuing the jewelers for breach of contract and fraud for claiming 10x less than actual value when paying for shipping.

Honestly I hope everyone involved gets fucked out of house and home lmfaoooo

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Those jewelers are SOL. Those insurance contracts are ironclad. They'll end up eating the cost AND the cost of the defense. Bold move cotton.