this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2026
43 points (93.9% liked)

UK Politics

4637 readers
165 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive link for those of us in Keir's inner circle.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

It's close to the perfect time. But coming back will not be easy.

[–] moderatecentrist@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think the UK is going to rejoin the EU soon, and yes it would probably take compromises - the EU might insist on the UK adopting the Euro and joining the Schengen Area. Who knows.

I guess more likely would be the UK negotiating some form of EU single market access in the next few years, like the EFTA countries have (Norway, Switzerland, Iceland, Liechtenstein). Starmer has even suggested this, as quoted in the article:

“We are better looking to the single market rather than the customs union for our further alignment,” he told Laura Kuenssberg.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't disagree. As little as that may seem or be, comercial agreements already carry a lot with them. The demand for standards alone implies a good deal of common ground.

[–] moderatecentrist@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

Single market access in some areas could be a big deal, but the EU might insist on freedom of movement for single market access, and like the article says, Labour committed to no freedom of movement with the EU in their manifesto. I wouldn't mind so much if they broke that manifesto commitment, but I assume Starmer will want to stick to that commitment.

[–] TheGoldenV@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

EU better have them make some serious concessions. Can’t reward stupidity or it’ll keep happening.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Thats the plan. Last i saw there were calls for a clause that would fine them an enormous sum if they left again in the first few years. They called it the "farage clause"

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jan/11/draft-farage-clause-eu-if-reform-uk-wins-election

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah. Happy to have them back but no more special treatment please and some provisions against flip flopping.

They had iirc the sweetest deal out of all the member countries, with rebates and exceptions to half the rules and obligations. But they still went out against all common sense, that should not be rewarded.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 4 points 2 days ago

They’re not getting the concessions Thatcher handbagged out of Delors. They join the EU on equal terms with other members. If they would prefer to stand proudly alone with their delusions of imperial grandeur and get pushed around by everyone else and eventually turned into a hollowed-out kleptostate run from Beijing, Riyadh, Mar-a-Lago and a dozen tax havens, then they can’t be helped. (Though if Scotland and Wales make a break for it, they should be welcomed into the EU on the standard terms.)