10
Using pathlib in constant? (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by Narann@lemmy.world to c/python@programming.dev
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Constant modules are modules that often contains variables that you want to use in many places without relying on hard coded values. Sometime you store paths (often relatives).

Is it a good thing to use pathlib.Path() object is modules dedicated to constant?

Or is there anything that you should know before choosing to do so?

I would say the same question appears for using re.compile() in constants.

Any advise?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] gigachad@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't see why not. However I like to have my constants module contain data structures as simple as possible, therefore I would prefer strings (which are also immutable), and create a Path object when I need it. I can see though that you usually won't have the case where you would not want the path to be a Path object.

this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
10 points (100.0% liked)

Python

6339 readers
7 users here now

Welcome to the Python community on the programming.dev Lemmy instance!

📅 Events

PastNovember 2023

October 2023

July 2023

August 2023

September 2023

🐍 Python project:
💓 Python Community:
✨ Python Ecosystem:
🌌 Fediverse
Communities
Projects
Feeds

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
erlingur@programming.dev
jnovinger@programming.dev
norambna@programming.dev