this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2026
94 points (100.0% liked)

news

24547 readers
773 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A reminder that as the US continues to threaten countries around the world, fedposting is to be very much avoided (even with qualifiers like "in Minecraft") and comments containing it will be removed.

Image is of a harbor in Tasiilak, Greenland.


NATO infighting? You love to see it, folks.

The latest incident of America's satrapies becoming increasingly unhappy about their mandated kowtowing involves, of all places, Greenland. As I'm sure most people here are aware, Greenland is an autonomous territory of Denmark with a degree of geopolitical and economic importance - the former due to its proximity to Russia, and the latter due to the proven and potential reserves of minerals that could be mined there. It's also been an odd fascination of Trump during his reign, now culminating in outright demands.

Trump has called for negotiations with Denmark to purchase Greenland, justifying this by stating that it would be safer from Russia and China under America's protection. Apparently, Norway's decision to not give him the Nobel Peace Prize further inflamed him (not that the Norweigan government decides who receives the prizes). He has also said that countries that do not allow him to make the decision - which not only includes Denmark, but also other European countries - will suffer increased tariffs by June, and that he has not ruled out a military solution.

This threat has led to much internal bickering inside the West, with European leaders stating they will not give in to Trump's demands, and even sending small numbers of troops to Greenland. The most bizarre part of this whole affair is that the US already basically has total military access and control over Greenland anyway, and has since the 1950s, when they signed an agreement with Denmark. There are already several US military facilities on Greenland, and B-52 bombers have famously flown in the vicinity of the island (and crashed into it with nuclear bombs in tow, in fact). Therefore, this whole event - in line with his all-performance, little-results presidency so far - seems to be largely about the theatrics of forcing the Europeans to continue to submit to his whims. I would not be surprised if they ultimately do sign a very imbalanced deal, though - the current European leadership is bound too tightly to the US to put up even half-hearted resistance.

This is all simultaneously occurring alongside the Canadian Prime Minister's visit to China in which longstanding sore spots in their bilateral relationship are being addressed, with China reducing tariffs on Canadian canola oilseeds, and Canada reducing tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, as well as currency swaps between their central banks, among many other things. It seems no accident that Canada's reconsideration of their relationship with China is occurring as Trump has made remarks about turning Canada into the next US state, as well as the demand for the renegotiation of the USMCA.


Last week's thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tervell@hexbear.net 51 points 5 days ago (4 children)

https://archive.ph/80CIv

China is building ‘full-stack’ defense-innovation cities

While the U.S. struggles to add rare-earth factories and drone-test ranges, Beijing is creating them in clusters.

more

The city of Baotou—long the heart of the rare-earths mining sector that has given China a stranglehold over the modern economy—is now working to establish entire next-generation production chains. In Inner Mongolia’s second-largest city, processed ores flow quickly to factories that make magnets and motors, and onward to production lines that crank out drones, eVTOL aircraft, and even humanoid robots. The result is an industrial powerhouse that other Chinese cities are working to emulate—and that U.S. firms are unable to match. Beijing views rare earths as not just merely a tool of global influence, but an ignition point for integrated industrial innovation. Their unique qualities enable the creation of magnets and motors that deliver more lift per watt and more torque per kilogram. Across China, local governments now co-locate rare-earth processing zones with component makers and drone and robotics parks, turning mineral hubs into full-stack ecosystems. In Sichuan Province, for example, the city of Mianyang is building on its reputation as a regional base of defense research and development with a major investment in permanent magnet construction. Such clusters reflect the government’s push for “new quality productive forces”: advanced industrial capacity built on secure inputs, dense supply chains, and fast scaling.

Baotou shows the model in its most complete form. City plans lay out a network of bases to support UAV testing, training, and logistics. This effort is anchored by the Rare Earth High-Tech Zone, where the proximity of component makers and downstream integrators speeds iteration and reduces supply-chain friction. Local government messaging describes a full chain that runs from mining and magnet production to motor fabrication and UAV assembly. Several rare-earth cities are taking aim at a particular market sector: the “low-altitude economy”: products, services, and infrastructure to support activities in airspace below 1,000 meters (3,280 feet). Such activities include delivery, surveillance, tourism, and urban air transport. The Civil Aviation Administration of China expects the sector to be worth up to 2.5 trillion RMB (about $500 billion) within a decade. Already, logistics drones are flying routes that link the mountainous inland province of Jiangxi to major delivery networks serving the Pearl River Delta. In Jiangxi, the city of Ganzhou has built a permanent-magnet-motor park and connected it to a low-altitude-economy park that provides R&D, manufacturing, operations support, and regulatory frameworks. The aim is to create a municipal-scale ecosystem with local sources of magnets, motors, airframes, and operational support, reducing lead times and accelerating scaling. Another low-altitude ecosystem is rising in Fujian Province, Jiangxi’s neighbor to the east. Chinese officials often sell the low-altitude economy as a boon to commerce and public services such as delivery, inspection, agriculture, and tourism. Defense-affiliated commentary and local armed forces activity, however, show how localities increasingly treat it as a dual-use resource for national defense.

Some low-altitude-economy parks are now building defense capacity into their tenant mix, using their talent, platforms, and industrial capacity to aid in defense mobilization. One Sichuan park has created a pair of specialized militia units: a reconnaissance platoon built around long-range UAVs and a company that specializes in the rapid repair of airfields. In Jiangsu, a local People’s Armed Forces Department has organized UAV-based reconnaissance units that have deployed for civilian missions such as disaster survey and water rescue—but are organized for use in wartime. Such militia teams provide structures for training, tasking, and integration during crises. This arrangement narrows the gap between commercial capacity and organized wartime support by keeping platforms, operators, and maintenance ecosystems close to the mobilization system. And China’s military gains as much as commercial firms do from the rise of full-stack, aviation-focused development-and-production centers. As a RUSI report noted, the production of many battlefield drones is constrained less by the ability to turn out airframes than by the availability of propulsion and actuation components. China is increasingly able to manage those constraints inside a single municipal industrial footprint. The wide distribution of such clusters, across coastal as well as inland regions, further strengthens the model. It cushions the system against localized shocks such as environmental enforcement, energy constraints, or regional bottlenecks. And it would complicate wartime efforts to disrupt production through targeted strikes or interdiction.

Like Chinese analysis, U.S. discourse increasingly treats permanent magnet motors as a chokepoint in the global supply chain. This has prompted the Pentagon to become the largest partner in MP Materials, which owns the only operational rare earth mine in the United States. But Baotou’s Rare Earth High-Tech Zone and its imitators show how U.S. policymakers must deepen their understanding and goals beyond current production counts or who owns what mine. While Beijing’s competitors struggle to build rare-earth processing plants, magnet factories, and high-performance motor supply chains, China is doing all of those at once, creating full-stack clusters that will widen its advantage in next-generation technologies.

free market enthusiasts when it turns out they have to actually plan industrial development shocked-pikachu

looking forward to when a single Chinese municipality starts outproducing the entire US

[–] carpoftruth@hexbear.net 21 points 5 days ago

in a recent newsmega someone asked if the US could catch up to China's rare earth capacity. the answer is no, the above story is why

load more comments (3 replies)