this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
15 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3624 readers
592 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No memes/pics of text

Post news related to the United States.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A similar decision in the UK resulted in clear-cutting old growth forests to feed biomass-burning power plants, with all the associated increase in atmosphere CO2

You also get all the same health consequences as burning coal. This is not a good move

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Well, they are not wrong. Trees are basically carbon neutral, they naturally release their carbon into the atmosphere when they die and rot, burning causes the same effect, just faster. Algae are the real carbon sinks, because when they die, they sink to the bottom of the ocean. Coal isn’t because it is carbon that has been sequestered underground.