this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
41 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

845 readers
297 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 22 points 3 months ago (4 children)

NASA’s leaders settled on a plan of baffling complexity: a single trip to the lunar surface could require 40-plus rocket launches

Wat? Didn't we do it in a single launch in the 1960s?

[–] BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net 29 points 3 months ago

Yeah but how much money did that make 7000 different middlemanagers who we've hired through a public-private partnership to avoid government graft? And how did that launch aid local small businessowners? Now we've put the contract on the heatshielding up for bidding so that Lockheed Martin can charge $2000 per screw-part

[–] ExotiqueMatter@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Unlike the Apollo program which had a purpose built launcher with every aspect of it made with the moon in mind, the current American manned lunar program will have to make do with at best the Frankenstein's monster made out of recycled space shuttle parts known as the SLS, and at worst the napo-baby hubris meets engineering reality joke known as the Starship.

Edit: Actually, Blue origin's heavy launcher could potentially save this clown-show when and if it comes out. Though even if that's the case I would still bet on China winning this second space race by a wide margin. The 21st century US just doesn't have what it takes to establish a productive semi-permanent presence on the Moon.

[–] puppygirlpets@hexbear.net 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

they ran out of nazi rocket scientists

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 3 months ago

Nah, just decided no one needed to preserve or actually document the rocket plans/designs

[–] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 11 points 3 months ago

Yes, but we kinda forgot how to build rockets like the Saturn V. Not to mention it was eye-wateringly expensive to build, something NASA could never do without some Cold War clout chasing kind of budget.