this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
43 points (100.0% liked)

guns

2653 readers
126 users here now

“Under no pretext"

Rules (Under review):

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

keltec's interest here is that the mechanisms can be slightly smaller, and reloading typically doesn't happen in self-defense shootings. if you need more than ~5 shots you don't need a hand gun you need comrades.

[–] no_pretext@hexbear.net 2 points 8 hours ago

Tbh I think it was a way to skip the difficult process of designing a working detachable magazine

[–] Kefla@hexbear.net 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Makes sense for the people who like that kind of thing I guess, but I don't want my gun to be small. Only thing a small gun is better at than a big gun is hurting your hands.

[–] Dessa@hexbear.net 7 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Concealability and portability, no?

[–] no_pretext@hexbear.net 1 points 9 hours ago

Concealability for sure, smaller guns allow "Deep Carry" which makes them almost completely undetectable in contrast to larger guns that print easily and require restricting your choice of clothing.

Rhett Neumayer (Demonstrated Concepts) and Tessa Booth have content about this topic on YouTube for those who are interested.

[–] BobDole@hexbear.net 5 points 18 hours ago

Especially with it being a .380

[–] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 10 points 23 hours ago

yeah size and weight are carrying optimizations.

with my situation i think if a handgun is going to be beneficial i'm not so worried about it printing