this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2026
629 points (99.1% liked)

Not The Onion

19306 readers
1532 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I hope the staff spat in their food

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 58008@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Evil. Gimme a better term and I'll use it. But for now: evil.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

evil implies the only way to beat them is to be "good'. it demonizes them into being monsters, which is no different than what they do.

a better term is reprobate.

an unprincipled or depraved person

[–] NeilBru@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would add unscrupulous, but it may be redundant.

Having or showing no regard for what is right or honorable.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

oh I like that.

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Evil is a nebulous term that can be applied by anyone to anything.

Similarly, calling them vile disgusting filth doesn't work, as it could be used by members of ICE to describe the innocent men women and children they abuse.

We need a term that satisfies several criteria.

It must be true, in so far that it is inarguably applicable to any member of ICE.

It must be understandable at a 5th grade reading level, because this is America and that's as good as most of his supporters can manage.

And it must not be applicable to the victims. Therefore the term cannot be purely emotional. But evoking an emotional response is kind of the goal.

Idk how about Genocide Squads?