this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2026
8 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

23212 readers
196 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm aware that the best defense is the threat of total annihilation to any country or group that shoots a missile at north America.

Consequences and strategic viability aside, what would happen if one, two, or a true promise number of missiles were launched at Ottawa? Is it that they would need to take an orbital trajectory and as such would be defended by similarly launched defenses?

What about the UK? Are there THAAD batteries dotting the perimiter of london just hidden?

Or is it just one of those fun illusions of safety that could be broken by a sufficiently determined group?

I (probably obviously) don't know anything about the military beyond stuff posted in the news mega

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] D61@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'd imagine that there are certain high priority areas that have some type of defense, most probably, the expectation is that so few rockets/missiles could reach places like Canada/USA/England that there would be enough time to use fighter jets to shoot them down effectively enough.

So, both yes and no answers your question.

[โ€“] Acute_Engles@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago

So, both yes and no answers your question.

is-this is this dialectics