this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2026
157 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

79136 readers
3218 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
157
‘They’ve pickled each others’ brains’ (sf.gazetteer.co)
submitted 1 week ago by utopiah@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

"I talk to young founders these days and for them, there’s no other world than the Trump world. I ask them what inspired them to go into tech and they say they read Marc Andreessen’s manifesto, they read Peter Thiel’s books, and I think, “Oh, your brain’s cooked.” They come in pre-pickled. But everyone else who could have told an alternate narrative has been hounded out of the industry."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Imagine reading Peter Thiel's books as anything besides a sociological analysis of the postmodern, capitalist West (I haven't, btw, I'm just assuming it's about ideology and not a cook book). Goddamn. I bet even Ayn Rand makes more sense....

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 week ago

I'm not a believer in Ayn Rand or objectivism, she was wrong on the fundamentals, but she's excellent brain exercise. It's vanishingly rare to find anyone who can meaningfully explain an organized, recursively-coherent single-idea philosophy for 70 pages (the Atlas Shrugged monologue) without clear contradiction if you accept her flawed premises. She truly, viscerally believed, and spent the time thinking about it to prove it (even if, again, she's wrong).

This manifesto is just someone who made some money post-facto rationalizing it with grade-school logic.