Europe
News and information from Europe ๐ช๐บ
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules (2024-08-30)
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org
view the rest of the comments
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/german-economy-rose-02-2025-2026-01-15/
It's not hugely impressive but after 2 years of decline, the economy rising by 0.2% in 2025 is a noticeable improvement.
Actually he is in an easy position to boost the economy. He has 500 billion Euro to basically spend as he sees fit. That would boost the economy. But unfortunately he uses the money to lint the pockets of his peers and the meager rest flows into industry from the early 20th century.
He could use those 500 billion to transition to renewable energy and fix the infrastructure and give tax breaks to the lower income bracket and - just like that - the economy would soar.
But nooo, we cannot have that. Stop the transition, buy gas and oil from dictators and give tax breaks to business owners who just stack the money instead of investing it. Because the investment environment is unstable as hell, because Merz and friends don't know where they want to go ยฏ\_(ใ)_/ยฏ
And thus, we're stuck at 0.2% growth.
The previous comment said "work on getting the economy started". I'm saying from a declining economy to a growing economy is making a start. In the face of tariffs from the US hurting exports I'd say it's not the worst start either.
If you are expecting a full turn around in a year and saying anything less is a failure, I think you need to adjust your expectations.
Edit: as an addition from the article
You can have an issue with his policy, all I'm saying is that from an economic perspective, it seems to be an improvement.
I expect recipes which work. If your export oriented economy is hurt by the geopolitical landscape you need to strengthen your domecstic demand. They're doing nothing of that sort. That is what I am complainig about.
So the economy is up, deficit is down, but it's not being done in the way you want, so it's bad?
I really can't see your point.
My point: if you deny, in times of crisis, the needed funds to your previous government, they subsequently grant it to you, and you manage to only get a 0.2% growth, when you would have the means of around 10% GDP at your disposal...you're doing it badly, yes.
And we're discussing all of that in the context of rising fascism...you need to be faster in letting the voters feel something.
Can I take this back to the start.
Comment 1 says the economy is bad.
I said, it has actually grown in 2025 for the first time in 3 years. Then linked a source.
I feel Ike you are moving the goal posts to make a point when all I did was contradict someone and give a source.
OP said in order to combat fascism we would need to get the economy started. We are talking about like a Marshall Plan, a New Deal kind of story, where large parts of the people feel the difference.
You tell me, that after shrinking, the 0.2% is a start. That is not the momentum we would need, that people can feel. It is better than a shrinking economy, yes. But in the same way that drinking piss is better than eating shit.
And that IS, and here's my point again, that Merz actually has the means for a huge kickstart. He's not seizing the opportunity.
OP said:
"Germany is questioning the future of the European project."
Nothing to do with my comment.
The comment I replied to said:
"If Merz could work on getting the economy started instead of parroting AfD shit, i would be so happy"
Going from a shrinking economy to a growing economy is literally the first step. Again, if that is not enough for you personally, fine, you do you.
What I am saying is that there was a positive change in the economy. Backed up with a source.
Argue all you want, what I said was accurate.
If I remember correctly the 500 billion loan is packaged in a way that it doesn't count towards the official deficit number, so this is pure smoke and mirrors.
"The economy" doesn't rise at all. It's just the BIP, probably the worst possible single number to measure the functioning of an economy, especially in circumstances of growing inequality.
The comment was that the economy needs to improve, and according to Reuters, it has.
If you know if another method of showing the health of a countries finances and can show it hasn't improved I would be happy to read about it.