this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
195 points (95.8% liked)
Technology
78661 readers
5296 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
"The VoidLink interface is localized for Chinese-affiliated operators, an indication that it likely originates from a Chinese-affiliated development environment."
Baha, shit propaganda.. Yes of cause it MUST be the Chinese ! I mean, it is impossible to fake an interface in another language, and we all know they are out to eat our children.. sigh..
And who says ? This is not better than the shit corps amazon, micro***p, etc, that are now identifying foreign 'threats' for the US Fascist regime. Who gave private corps the right to examine AND convict other nations - without any transparency or oversight - on a whim from their Boss.
Get away from US *unts and their insane propaganda - ASAP !!
Certified .ml moment
The reasoning is curious: "This thing that China is credibly accused of doing is bad, therefore it cannot be China that's doing it".
Have you looked at the files? They were obviously generated in a Chinese-affiliated development environment, and the interface is designed for Chinese speakers. Which is exactly what they said. They very pointedly DIDN’T say that the malware was written by the Chinese government or one of their affiliates.
It’s also not in the same style as the stuff generated by the various Chinese APT groups, so is likely by some third party with Chinese connections. It’s a very methodical and thorough collection, but it wasn’t discovered via an attack — the researchers stumbled across the test environment. And that’s not something that’s likely to be the case with state actor-related groups.
Did you get your $0.50 for that?
Yikers lmaooo. Maybe it could.. but what if...OMG it's true? you aren't in control of your own thoughts it seems.
you know, you’re right. it couldn’t have been china or russia since it’s far more advanced than typical.