Linux

60973 readers

1050 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

nooter692@lemmy.ml

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

Why does Mint not auto update major versions? (lemmy.world)

submitted 23 hours ago by halloween_spookster@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've been wondering why Mint doesn't seem to have an automatic major version upgrade built in? For those that have an opinion, do you agree with not having this? Why/why not?

I've been running Mint 21 for over a year now. I started using it not long before Mint 22 came out and have been dragging my feet on upgrading in fear of breaking something and having to reinstall (and losing something in the process). I'm in the process of setting up proper backups so I'll probably do it after those are set up (or maybe wait until Mint 23).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] halet@programming.dev 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

FWIW, some (perhaps even most/all) uBlue derivatives actually do automatic major version updates. Though, thanks to the bootc-model, they're dealing with a whole lot less state(/moving parts); hence smooth updates are somewhat expected. The built-in rollback functionality doesn't hurt either.

[–] kumi@feddit.online 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The built-in rollback functionality doesn’t hurt either.

More than that I think it's a prerequisite for doing this.

[–] halet@programming.dev 1 points 12 hours ago

You might be absolutely correct on that.

Though, I do wonder what would prevent a stateless system accompanied by a healthy dose of integrity tests from pulling this off.