this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
431 points (99.8% liked)

Technology

78627 readers
4695 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Flock saga continues.

A handful of police departments that use Flock have unwittingly leaked details of millions of surveillance targets and a large number of active police investigations around the country because they have failed to redact license plates information in public records releases. Flock responded to this revelation by threatening a site that exposed it and by limiting the information the public can get via public records requests.

Completely unredacted Flock audit logs have been released to the public by numerous police departments and in some cases include details on millions Flock license plate searches made by thousands of police departments from around the country. The data has been turned into a searchable tool on a website called HaveIBeenFlocked.com, which says it has data on more than 2.3 million license plates and tens of millions of Flock searches.

The situation highlights one of the problems with taking a commercial surveillance product and turning it into a searchable, connected database of people’s movements and of the police activity of thousands of departments nationwide. It also highlights the risks associated with relying on each and every law enforcement customer to properly and fully redact identifiable information any time someone requests public records; in this case, single mistakes by individual police departments have exposed potentially sensitive information about surveillance targets and police investigations by other departments around the country.

Archive: http://archive.today/yXLPQ

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Feyd@programming.dev 15 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Just FYI, using the term luddite derogatorily may not be as cool as you think it is. They were essentially an instance of organized labor flexing their power and not really "against technological advancement" like the term gets bandied about.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luddite

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I am aware, but i am using it in a colloquial sense. And you understood my point; which is exactly how the general public that needs to be swayed will interpret it.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 2 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

You can and should make your point without denigrating labor movements.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 5 points 20 hours ago

Originally the Pedants were a group of trans atheist Linux users from Pedantia, so I won’t use it as a pejorative in this context.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Uhh okay? Language and its use changes. If you want to be effective in getting your point across you need to keep up. The choir in lemmy isn't who needs to be persuaded.

Feel free to be technically correct, but I would like to see the idea take mass adoption instead.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

technically correct

Despite the memes, also typically not the best kind of correct.

Before someone says it.