this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
1051 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

78627 readers
5286 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

The internet will get back up if it goes down. It is very decentralized. Sea cables and DNS is where most of the centralization occurs, and DNS going down is not at all the end of the internet. How man sea cables have to be broken at once for the internet to break, I'm not entirely sure.

Meshtastic is a cool thing and it is very useful, internet up or down.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 37 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

That won't help for situations where a government shuts down access to the internet.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 1 points 42 minutes ago

Friend: do not underestimate how much greed the cel companies are capable of. Many have been working on their own satellite setups in preparation and blasting it in everyone’s face lately.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 13 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

How resistant would this be to jamming? Iran managed to black out Starlink.

And how trackable is it? Not sure how many people would be prepared to run one of these boxes if the Revolutionary Guard are going to come knocking.

[–] frozenicecube@lemmy.ca 8 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It's pretty easy to jam as it's just radio waves. Increase the noise on the channel and the chirps of your msg don't get heard. That said there are some options to vary the channel as a group, and jamming a broad and robust mesh completely vs an area of nodes is a bit harder.

Trackable as in traceable? You mean finding your node location? By default not overly difficult but again, can be set up to make it hard to find you.

[–] johntash@eviltoast.org 2 points 1 hour ago

Wouldn't it be pretty easy to track down the source since its just radio?

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Riots fix that, not meshtastic

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 19 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Riots are better coordinated when people can communicate wirelessly

A government can shut down a riot of 10,000

It struggles with 10 1,000 person riots.

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

I think at that point it's more of a revolution than a riot, but I agree

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

No doubt, but meshtastic really is a temporary solution, but a very good solution since it's only necessary for a temporary amount of time. I'm just saying there aren't really many cases outside of a catastrophic mass human extinction event that would disable the internet infrastructure beyond maybe a few years if that. Won't be a library of alexandria moment from a connectivity side, but which servers are still up is the real question

[–] DNS@discuss.online 0 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I didn't know riots and protests 50+ years ago depended on the internet. Crazy.

[–] desertdruid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 13 hours ago

they depended on communication

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 4 points 15 hours ago

You missed the word "better".

I never said meshtastic is a hard requirement.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 8 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

If they shut the Internet and there is a decent meshtastic network they will jam that as well.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 17 points 13 hours ago

This is a non answer. yes, hypothetically they can, but the whole point of finding alternative channels is to make it difficult for them to do so, to the point that they might not even try.

That pessimism of "they can jam it anyways" is like saying do not wear a helmet while riding a bike, if you are meant to die that day, you will die regardless of head protection.

Plus, it will take resources for them to jam things, and the more resources they need to do that shit the faster it will deplete them and the less they can do, it is so obvious I do not know how to write it without sounding demeaning.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 6 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Maybe so, but incompetence is persistent within fascist organizations, and it adds an extra problem for them to deal with, which has value for that fact alone.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 minute ago

It adds a lot of extra risk since each node is a constant radio beacon that is easily trackable.

Compared with handheld radio that broadcast and disappear.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 5 points 14 hours ago

There are normally only a few points at which traffic enters the country. Shutting them down will effectively cut you from most of the Internet, and the rest that remains will be fully in the jurisdiction that oppresses you.