this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
64 points (100.0% liked)

Games

21195 readers
443 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As reported by Eurogamer, Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney took to X (formerly Twitter) to criticize an attempt by US lawmakers to ban the social media app and its accompanying generative AI tool, Grok. The move came after users discovered that Elon Musk's Grok has the ability to take photos of real people, including minors, and produce images of them undressed or in otherwise sexually compromising positions, flooding the site with such content.

"Reason #42 for open platforms: to shut down every politician’s incessant demands to all gatekeepers to censor all of their political opponents," Sweeney wrote in a first tweet responding to MacRumors' report of US politicians requesting that Apple and Google remove X and Grok from their app stores.

"All major AIs have documented instances of going off the rails," Sweeney continued in a follow up tweet. "All major AI companies make their best efforts to combat this; none are perfect. Politicians demanding gatekeepers selectively crush the one that's their political opponent's company is basic crony capitalism."

"AI going off 'guardrails' is not the same as actively excusing content for pedophiles," wrote Remap and former Waypoint editor, Patrick Klepek, in response. "Your priorities as someone in charge of a company that makes a video game catering to young people are completely off."

404 Media's report from January 5 at the beginning of this saga offers illustrative examples of Grok's newly-discovered capabilities, like influencers undressed, made to appear pregnant, or shown breastfeeding a child. There are also extensive reports of users generating such material from images of minors.

Theremoved, Abuse, & Incest National Network (RAINN) defines child sexual abuse material (CSAM) as "evidence of child sexual abuse" that "includes both real and synthetic content, such as images created with artificial intelligence tools." One of RAINN's examples of CSAM is "any content that sexualizes or exploits a child for the viewer's benefit."

Since the controversy came to light, the only change X has made has been moving Grok's ability to generate images in tweet replies behind a paywall⁠—X now appears to be more directly profiting off of Grok's ability to generate CSAM than it was in the first place.

This is all particularly galling in the face of the actual politically-motivated censorship Sweeney has overseen on the platform that helps make him a billionaire. Back in December, the Epic Games Store followed Steam's lead in banning the art game, Horses, for hazy reasons, an outgrowth of the pressure placed on payment processing companies by conservative activist groups to censor transgressive art and legal pornography on the internet.

Given the opportunity, Sweeney appears eager to defend an unprecedented online sexual humiliation machine, calling for open platforms and free speech while presiding over censorship on his own, closed platform. Sweeney's follow-up may have the beginnings of a solution, though: "All major AIs have documented instances of going off the rails." If this is what we can expect from such tools, maybe they should all be banned.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 10 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Only if X cooperate and they will only cooperate if you can prove the user is from your jurisdiction in the first place.

The police do not have the resources to investigate thousands of violations, they want the platforms to behave responsibly.

BTW, the filthy people we are outraged about won't just vanish, they will simply smarten up while every normal UK citizen will have to log in with their ID. Sounds cool. Because I don't live there.

Every normal UK citizen will have to pay for VPN or get off the platform because it'll be blocked at the DNS level if it escalates that far. Every influencer will be expected to get off it (and will conform) because staying on a platform banned by the state for CSAM will make them unemployable and persona non grata in UK media. All UK content on the platform will drop off the map and all interest any average person with the will to bypass a ban will disappear because there will be nothing culturally british to interest them on it anymore.

Where will the British go? I don't know. There will be a significant gain of UK users on other platforms though. With any luck it'll see less fash influence within the UK too as it's easily the strongest and most influential fascist promoting platform right now.

[–] Lowleekun@hexbear.net 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Imagine a world where we could end a platform for promotion of fascism instead of conjuring up perverts terrorists every time

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 8 points 23 hours ago

If that had happened to chan pre 2012 I suspect a lot of current shit wouldn't be happening. They never should have been allowed a space to find one another scattered in rare isolated spaces distant apart. They never would've been able to organise into an online fringe and that fringe would never have broken into mainstream without that online organising, anarchic and stochastic as it was.