this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
545 points (96.9% liked)

Games

22748 readers
522 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
545
Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney argues banning Twitter over its ability to AI-generate pornographic images of minors is just 'gatekeepers' attempting to 'censor all of their political opponents' (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 2 days ago by RetroGoblet79@eviltoast.org to c/games@sh.itjust.works
218 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

If you seriously think that there is no moral difference between someone being sexually abused and them not being sexually abused then maybe you should be in prison for all our safety.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

That's not what I said. How are you this stupid?

I said I think they are both, equally morally reprehensible. They both belong in the very bottom of Dante's inferno.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't think there's a moral difference between depicting "victimless" CSAM and CSAM containing a real person. I think they're both, morally, equally awful.

You called them "morally equally awful", so yes, that is what you said.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yes. They are both the worst of the worst. I place both in the very bottom of Dantes inferno.

Or do you still struggle to understand what that means?

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

I do understand, i (apparently most people on here) just think that you are very weird for thinking of them as equal.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago

If hating every single instance of CSAM regardless of victimhood makes me weird. Then I'm gladly weird.