this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
62 points (91.9% liked)
Applied Psychology
483 readers
55 users here now
Like any other psychology sub, except only post psychology things that are immediately usable. For example, see the posts in this sub.
You can edit titles to make the how to apply this psychology to your life more obvious.
Related:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Two weird sentences to be in the same conclusions.
It’s hilarious the contortions people are going through to interpret this result in a positive light.
A- prefix means “without”.
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/a-
Correct. 64.6% did not fit into the "Without" toxic group.
I think the issue is the percentage. It's the biggest group, but most people think that "most" means over 50%.
This. I'm seeing a lot of people in the comments who don't understand the concept of plurality as opposed to majority.
It is weird though:
So the majority does have some toxicity.
But that’s not how “toxic”ism works. Like you’re not a toxic person if you do some toxic things some of the time. You’re a toxic person if you do it all the time or the majority of the time. Everyone says sexuality is a scale, that doesn’t mean you’re straight if you’re not 100% gay. There are some parts of you that do one thing, but you’re to other side of the scale.
I did not state most are toxic. Here:
I've highlighted the word that is doing the heavy lifting here.
The article focused on "atoxic", whithout the very reasonable distinction you are making: atoxic and low toxicity (and perhaps moderate toxicity? Debatable) can both be considered not toxic in general. Which does mean > 50%. But this is implied, not explicitly stated.
No men have to be perfect paragons of virtue or they are toxic pigs. The study is wrong reeeeew. /s
I mean, sure, but they've split up the toxic portion into several groups, and kept non-toxic as one group. So a modal view of this means nothing