this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2026
490 points (100.0% liked)

Memes of Production

359 readers
1110 users here now

Seize the Memes of Production

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

founded 6 days ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

While I agree I hate the example of 'turning up AC because it implies it's us as end consumers as opposed to corps doing stupid shit. Like the AI slop war and container ships that create more emissions in 1 second than a normal human can create their entire life.

[–] JamBandFan1996@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yeah but it is up to all of us. The moneymakers at the top or more responsible for the shit we're in, but we are all responsible. We are fucked until everyone is capable of accepting a portion of the blame

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Container ships are by far the most efficient way to transport things we have. What is you problem with them? You can not transport things from A to B with less CO2 emissions per distance. Please do the math for the 1 second = more emissions than a human in his entire life,

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They are the most efficient when moving shit accross the globe. But the shear volume of ships moving things accross the globe is problematic. It would be more efficent to produce goods locally. And only use ships to move raw goods that cant be produced locally. Corporations dont because labor in poorer countries can be easier to exploit...

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Sure it is a lot, but not even nearly the scale to what was suggested in that comment. Heating, for example, causes an order of magnitude more emissions.

[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not that they aren't efficient it's the idea of guilt and responsibility being laid on the end consumer as opposed to corps who have the capital to invest in research to develop cleaner and more efficient technologies as opposed to runaway greed, CEO bonuses, stock kickbacks, etc. This is again not saying end consumers are not responsible at all, it's more stating that corps are in a much better position to do much more, whereas end consumers can only do so much.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

That does not mean you can make up stuff.