(dsa doing a cope that all their golden tickets printed democrat over protests against land sales in synagogue, but as one wise poster said - no one is free, until the buses are free)
https://xcancel.com/jvplive/status/2009652182044307964 - jvp take, not on the "antisemitism" of chants, but rather land sales inside pisraeli outposts masquerading as religious institutions
earlier obamdani chicanery https://xcancel.com/barbarismcrit/status/2009789817002094664
martin skrelli (who is alive?) has opinion https://xcancel.com/MartinShkreli/status/2009723958145253429
Is there another clip/screenshot of her actually calling to disregard free speech instead of just being a shitlib?
alleged by her antisemitism is a hate crime against the whitest of the white people, while rhetorically supporting prescribed groups is free speech issue. i think you can make this leap, especially considering her supporting ihra definition of antisemitism and tireless workings
i mean i can read between lines, but sure, technically, she didn't say that what they did was illegal. considering she mischaracterized protests against land sales in west bank as going into jewish neighborhood, i don't feel particularly charitable, but technically she didn't lie here as well. nor did they lead with those chants, but that's in the eyes of the beholder innit. so 0 pinocchios, perfect language use, will vote again.
5 hail marys and 5 citations needed episodes (or just lawyer weasely language) for you
The good faith liberal take is to defend free speech and know that as a politician, you have no business policing what is said during a protest. You know, like the ACLU upheld for Nazis marching on Skokie. This is a scratched lib moment.
No, the Venn diagram isn't necessarily a circle but ok.
I too love social democrats. Especially when they represent the US Democratic party.