this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2026
998 points (99.3% liked)

politics

27074 readers
1995 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Shortly after a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer shot and killed a woman in Minneapolis on Wednesday, city leaders began looking into whether the officer had violated state criminal law.

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey said, “We collectively are going to do everything possible to get to the bottom of this, to get justice, and to make sure that there is an investigation that is conducted in full.” Police Chief Brian O’Hara followed up by saying that the state’s Bureau of Criminal Apprehension is “investigat[ing] whether any state laws within the state of Minnesota have been violated.”

If they conclude that state law has been violated, the question is: What next? Contrary to recent assertions from some federal officials, states can prosecute federal officers for violating state criminal laws, and there is precedent for that.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you think we got to this point only because of Republicans... You haven't been paying attention.

No they're not the same exactly, but democratic inaction is nearly as bad as it allows this kind of shit to happen.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The dems are every bit as effective as the people who stay home instead of voting. When it's important, they do nothing.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Blaming the voters for rightly seeing the dems won't fight for them either isn't helping the situation.

We wouldn't be in this mess if the democratic party hadn't made excuse after excuse. We've been betrayed over and over and that takes its toll on people.

I still hold my nose and vote D because they're the lesser of two evils clearly, but I can understand why so many are tuned out.

[–] freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Did you know Democrats originally tried to make single payer a part of ACA?

The problem is, they needed 60 votes in the Senate, and ONE Democrat, Joe Lieberman, joined EVERY SINGLE REPUBLICAN in voting against the public option.

1 single Republican voter crossing the aisle could have delivered single payer, but idiots blame the Dems. Electing 1 more Democrat instead of a Republican could have delivered single payer, but idiots blame the Dems. 40 Republicans and 1 Democrat voted NO against Single Payer, and brilliant minds everywhere gargled BOTH SIDES SAME!! You can't make this shit up.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

I did, the funny part is instead they literally went with Romney's plan and still got shit on forever for it.

Trying to reason and play politics with facists doesn't work, and its long past time they learn that.

Did you know the Democrats actively prop up republican nutjobs (financially supporting their campaigns) because they think it's easier to win against them? One of those nutjobs was Donald Trump.

You can't make this shit up