this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2026
14 points (100.0% liked)
dailygames
3017 readers
94 users here now
Community for daily games like Wordle, Connections etc.
Post your daily games and scores. Discover new games and discuss with others.
Find games
- The most comprehensive list of Wordle-like games and resources
- Lemmy-Thread featuring a lot of Wordle-style recommendations
- NYT Games Various puzzles including the original Wordle
- The Dles Curated collection of 200+ daily games
Share your results
Itβs useful to wrap your results in a markdown codeblock to preserve the layout. Put three backticks ``` before and after your result to create a codeblock.
π¨π¨β¬β¬β¬
π¨π©β¬β¬β¬
π©π©π¨π¨β¬
π©π©π©π©π©
Spoilers
Please put possible spoilers in spoiler tags
visible spoiler title
hidden content
Rules
- Be nice
- Don't cheat
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The very first clue.
Why do you think it's saying that Stella is Pam's neighbour?
I am trying to not be rude
Can you explain it with words?
No one to the right of Ruby is Pam's neighbor. Am I tripping? Like how is everyone else getting this but meβ½
This is a legit question. I feel like I'm experiencing a stroke in slow motion.
Ohh I think I see what you are missing. "To the right of Ruby" doesn't mean "the one card to the right". It means every card to the right in the same row. So it's not just talking about Stella, but also Uma and Tina. Uma and Tina are both Pam's neighbours.
Thanks for handholding me through that.
Haha no problem. I thought there might have been a misunderstanding of the rules somewhere, which is why I was trying to get you to explain your thought process.
And you rock for that.
I hope you can start having fun with these, I like them a lot. Some of the logic is really tricky, but there's always a way to figure out the next innocent/criminal.
You know what's wild? I actually have a post grad in stem. I really don't understand why I let dumb stuff like this get to me
Anyways, thank you again.
It took me 33 minutes to solve this one today. I always feel pretty slow when I come into these threads. I got hard stuck more than once.
If you misunderstood the rules then no amount of deduction is going to help you, unless you manage to deduce that you misunderstood the rules.
I definitely didn't understand the rules.
If you use the Inspect tool (click the Inspect button then a specific clue) it will give you all the necessary definitions for the clue. Would this have given you what you needed?
If not donβt be afraid to tag me on future posts; Iβm happy to help you as well.
Going into the weekend where the puzzles get harder youβll definitely need to use tags to figure things out. I wanted to make sure youβd seen that because I remember your frustration yesterday too.
The first clue says explicitly that the next person is Pam's neighbor.
My first screenshot shows that the next person is very much not.
It doesn't say that the next person is Pam's neighbour at all, actually. Just that Pam only has one innocent neighbour, to the right of Ruby.