this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2026
136 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

832 readers
443 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RiotDoll@hexbear.net 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'd like a process that attacks Ancient Claims that's sensitive to the fact that some of them are legitimate.

Like, native tribes have a case, israel and... whatever is going on with Greenland do not.

if the last time there was a state headed by x people was literally thousands of years ago, and the people have been vacated that long, it's pretty hard to be serious about it.

if those people still live on their lands in diminished fashion? if they're still around and still live downstream of oppression meant to keep them under thumb? if they were displaced in a one-sided colonial war and genocide? yeah, the least that can be done is restoring lands to their rightful owner (the descendants of the ones robbed and murdered) - i can abide that. i think that would be cool. If a tribal coalition had ambitions to rule the PNW i'd be like hell yeah motherfuckers can i hellp?

but then it's like, the diaspora set in motion in the first fucking century CE can't reasonably claim a fucking thing about Palestine. Nor is "white people were a present on Greenland once a thousand years ago" valid at all.

but if you're a group affected by such Ancient Claim it's easy to invest yourself if you're predisposed to it. Kind of a scary amount of momentum as desperate but privileged people start looking for a frontier opportunity to escape the troubles back home... it's not legitimate but i'd love to see that shit in the context of an articulated deconstruction+destruction of the premise.

[–] Euergetes@hexbear.net 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'd like a process that attacks Ancient Claims that's sensitive to the fact that some of them are legitimate

the land claims of colonized peoples are not ancient, and they're borne of ongoing injustice. we need to be very strict about not allowing cynical asymmetrical analogies to be considered in the same category.

israeli claims are not anything like the klamath wanting their land back which was stolen less than 300 years ago, from a nation that still oppresses them. israeli claims are like a nahua guy showing up to the navajo reservation demanding they give him aztlán

[–] RiotDoll@hexbear.net 10 points 2 months ago

Sorry, right. That's what i was trying to articulate