this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2026
69 points (94.8% liked)

Slop.

772 readers
597 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Gotta counter the Lemmygrad propaganda going on here lately.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Makhno was actually relatively good. There were plenty of much shittier anarchist and anarchist-adjacent leaders, whom no one likes to remember.

[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

IIRC wasn't one of the big problems with Makhno the inconsistent control over the territory and discipline among armed forces leading to various element committing pogroms on their own initiative?

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This was absolutely everyone's problem during the Civil War. Makhno, at least, made a serious effort to combat it, like Bolsheviks.

[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

This was absolutely everyone's problem during the Civil War.

yea Europe moment.

Edit: except the Whites, who I don't think viewed it as a problem.

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 3 points 3 weeks ago

Some White generals also viewed it as a problem, not because they cared about Jews, but because their troops were pillaging instead of following orders, and all the loot made them not very mobile. They didn't do anything about it in the end.