this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2026
787 points (99.6% liked)

Comic Strips

21037 readers
4406 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip 53 points 3 days ago (3 children)

This comic isn't telling us to ignore the news. It's telling us to not engage with incendiary media personalities, like Megyn Kelly. Their entire strategy is to piss people off, because an angry viewer is an engaged viewer. Whenever someone posts something awful that Kelly or someone like her said, they're actually helping that media personality. The only way to defeat them is to not engage.

We should always engage with current events and the news, but be media literate enough to spot the trolls.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Id ask who Megyn Kelly is, but the context tells me I should just keep my bliss

[–] ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes, keep your bliss. She says things so hateful they made Charlie Kirk look tame. Sometimes people will post on Lemmy about some of the hateful shit she says and then I get downvoted for explaining that they're helping her brand.

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 days ago

There is a Tipping Point in that strategy though. Because eventually if every single person who knows she's full of shit ignores her then the only people that listen to her are people that believe her. And they don't see anyone saying anything else so clearly she's right. That's the conclusion they'll draw. And of course the number of people that believe that will just keep growing . There has to be some pushback.

[–] morto@piefed.social 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"A strange game. The only winning move is not to play"

[–] Jerb322@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Really, the outrage dealers have such a corrosive effect on public discourse that it is probably better to remain completely uninformed than to be informed through them.