this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2026
-12 points (20.0% liked)
China
560 readers
50 users here now
Genuine news and discussion about China
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Xi is panicking watching the effectiveness of Ukraine's oil sanctions program. Xi Thought twice about his invasion plans.
The real reason Ukraine and Taiwan are a threat to Russia and China is because their close proximity and cultural connections allow their people to see the benefits of democracy up close. Authoritarians hate when reality threatens their plans.
LOL.
Harvard University studied Chinese sentiment for 15 years and determined that 95.5% of Chinese people approve of their government. You think the people of China live under a grinding authoritarian dictatorship and hate the conditions but still approve?
Chinese people make up over 20% of international tourism. You think they don't see what is happening in other countries?
You live in a fantasy land.
Yeah, the 95% approval rating is a famous study. Sure, what else would Chinese people express other than approval of their government if and when asked? Everyone who even slightly criticizes the Chinese Communist Party would forcibly disappear.
However, when Chinese citizens are surveyed anonymously, support for party and government plummets.
Again. Living in a fantasy world. People in China criticize the party all the time. There are protests all over the country. Hell, there are protests in Xinjiang. And they're live streamed, recorded and posted, and no one is being disappeared for that.
Reading this report from Cambridge is very much like reading clear popaganda. It claims to be an impartial journal, but the first thing it does is it uses the incorrect name of the party. The party's official name is the Communist Party of China, which follows a long tradition of communist party naming convention. The journal uses the Chinese Communist Party, which is not the name of the party.
Then it says that the Harvard study "routinely appears in Chinese propaganda", as though a 15 year study conducted by one of the most prestigious universities in the world is somehow to be doubted as Chinese propaganda. This is not missed.
It then uses the phrase "tendency for citizens in an autocracy to conceal political opinions". Again, not missed. China is not an autocracy. It is a bureaucracy. A vast bureaucracy. Xi does not wield absolute power. He was elected in parliamentary process. Hu was not an autocrat. Jiang was not an autocrat. Xi didn't abolish the bureaucracy. Xi didn't abolish local governments. The idea that China is an autocracy makes me think these authors have no integrity whatsoever.
Further, the list experiments in this report conflate willingness to protest with non-support of the party. I think it's obvious that this is a contrived conclusion. There are protests all over the world by people who support their government.
"the survey as administered through the internet" and "recruited approximately 2000 people".
The Harvard study included face to face interviews and covered more than 31k people in both urban and rural settings.
This report you've linked certainly requires follow up but it absolutely does not invalidate the work of the Ash Center.