this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2026
156 points (99.4% liked)

United Kingdom

5724 readers
342 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk -1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

A quick Google suggests the salary is around £30,000, which would put it above the living wage. It's not an amazing salary, but let's say that got bumped to £40,000 and then you'd need to hire probably at least 10x the number of examiners to be able to cope with the demand, then suddenly that gets very expensive.

There'd be arguments about whether it's actually financially worth it and whether there's even though labour supply to achieve the number of examiners required.

[–] Poach@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Cars are expensive by their nature. Pass the costs onto the drivers.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So, you want to discourage people from taking tests, which will result in: fewer people driving and, of those who do drive, more of them driving without a license? How do you plan on replacing the transport for those people who decide they aren't going to drive - will that be improving public transport? How would that happen?

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

which will result in: fewer people driving

Yes, don't need to read any further.

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Making it harder for poorer working people to get to work. This would be yet another cost that people have to face. Those that can't afford to re-take it but need their car to get to work would end up criminalised.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 days ago

Making it harder for poorer working people to get to work.

Poor people are less likely to drive because they can't afford to get a car. I never learnt because I didn't have £1000s to get insured, didn't even bother looking at the other costs involved because the numbers were so far beyond anything I could even consider.

Was only in my late 20s that I even replaced the bike from my teens, by the time I replaced it most of the gears didn't work anymore. Sure, some poor people do drive, but far more rich people do. Just looking at stats for household car ownership by area clearly shows it, I live in a large town and the rich side of town is >95% vehicle ownership and around 20% have 3 or more. My street is 27% of households have no vehicles, the most deprived areas of town are majority of households don't own a vehicle.

I repeated this with every town I have ever lived in and while the numbers vary the same trends apply every time.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 days ago

People have to pay for their tests, so the cost would come out of that. Less than +25% fee presumably given that the other costs like the car won't be changing to pay them more.