this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2026
106 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
842 readers
664 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No see, this analogy makes sense because A: The GMD is the older, more established party (uh by a decade or two), and B: the CPC rose up in rebellion against the former (uh, hm, after their leaders started getting arrested and hanged, and their members killed, and their peasant support base also started getting killed) so yeah since the Communists started the civil war it makes sense
So the CPC fought for slavery?
I'd say there's no perfect analogy where you compare the sides in the Chinese civil war vs. the American one. The ROC was barely a functioning nation when the civil war broke out and never really unified the country completely. There was never a clean split where some provinces sided with either party. The People's republic was proclaimed in 1949 when the civil war war pretty much finished, and the ROC government moved to taipei soon after. As an analogy, the american civil war is just not very useful, and that's not even getting into stuff like which side wanted to keep slavery or landlord rule going.