this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2026
508 points (99.8% liked)
science
23466 readers
543 users here now
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
rule #1: be kind
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Spoiler alert: you can't afford it.
Speak for the Americans. The rest of us have no trouble doing so
also cancer :)
Any of the "regrows damage" side of thing scares the fuck out of me. I mean I want it to come and ASAP, but I also don't want to play chicken with C
Cancer is largely based on your genetics, except for extreme causes like asbestos or smoking. It’s worth the risk.
Not in this case.
"Stem cells survive much longer than ordinary cells, increasing the chance that they might accumulate genetic mutations. It might take only a few mutations for one cell to lose control over its self-renewal and growth and become the source of cancer."
https://www.hsci.harvard.edu/stem-cells-and-cancer
The news article, as well as the published work, state that:
Long-term side effects will need to researched of course and there might still be stem cells involved in the process, however that doesn't seem to be the case according to what we know as of now.
I will gladly throw it on top of my monstrous pile of promising-looking research in hopes that it becomes a successful procedure.